Usually Gus features a Pathetic Pundit Prediction as part of his weekly NFL forecast, but I found one that was so absurd that I had to chime in. This week, Venti Latte Mocha Cleveland Steamer predicts that the Vikings will best the Lions 38-7. This is patently absurd for at least four reasons.
First, there is the very real possibility that the Lions, galvanized by crisis and media scrutiny, will pull off the upset. I personally don’t believe this will happen. In fact, I think that Detroit’s offense will continue to stumble; on the other side of the ball, the reëmerging Minnesota Moving Company will play Kalimba Edwards like a thumb piano. However, the possibility — however slight — of a Lions win remains.
Furthermore, King needs to consult recent history. In fact, he ought to consult not-so-recent history — he’d have to go back to October 14, 2004 to find the last time the Vikings scored at least 38 points. This season, the Vikings have only scored more than 28 points only once (against a hapless New Orleans squad) and averaged a meager 18 points per game. (That dismal statistic, alas, is actually inflated: five of Minnnesota’s 21 touchdowns this year have come from defense.) While King is to be commended for not committing the oft-TMQ-identified sin of predicting a statistically-improbable score (e.g. Tennessee 15, Jacksonville 4), it is absurd to predict such an anomalous score given the recent output of the Vikings‘ offense.
A third reason comes from the current identity of the Vikings, who are winning games with clock control and an aggressive defense. Indeed, I would argue that unless Minnesota’s defense scores 14 points, a 38-7 Viking victory should be grounds for Zygi Wilf to immediately dismiss Mike Tice. Running up the score is incompatible with clock control, and the strength of this Vikings team is in its ability to exhaust opposing defenses and force opposing offenses into high-risk, low-reward plays (the sort one might be resorting to if one wished to score 5 touchdowns in a game).
Finally, I would posit that people who make money based on accurately predicting on the outcomes of games are likely to have more reliable opinions than Putatively Fair Trade Doubleshot, who gets paid no matter what crap he fills his column inches with. The Vikings are only favored by 3 in Vegas, and Tradesports forecasts only a 50% chance that they will win by more than one point. (Even more tellingly, Tradesports suggests that there is only a 49.5% chance that the combined score of both squads will meet or exceed 38.)
I think the Vikings will win, but I’m absolutely sure it will be closer than 38-7. My prediction: Vikings win by 13 or less.